Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PolyGram Pick polygram.ink |
0% | 100% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open on PolyGram → |
Polymarket polymarket.com |
0% | 100% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open on PolyGram → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open on PolyGram → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open on PolyGram → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open on PolyGram → |
Live odds for Polymarket-based markets come from the Polygon order book. Non-Polymarket venues show attributes only; clicking any row opens the market on PolyGram.
Active sub-markets
| Wimbledon, Qualification WTA: Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Bianca Andreescu | 0% Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 100% Bianca Andreescu |
| Completed Match | 100% YES | 0% NO |
| Wimbledon, Qualification WTA: Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Bianca Andreescu Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 0% Over 2.5 | 100% Under 2.5 |
| Wimbledon, Qualification WTA: Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Bianca Andreescu Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% Over | 100% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification WTA: Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Bianca Andreescu Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% Over | 100% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification WTA: Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Bianca Andreescu Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 100% Andreescu | 0% Sasnovich |
Market context
The under-the-turf reality is that Aliaksandra Sasnovich and Bianca Andreescu are locked in a decisive Wimbledon qualification match on grass, with the main draw spot hanging in the balance. Sasnovich, ranked 124, faces Andreescu, ranked 180, in what appears to be their first head-to-head encounter, a fact that strips away historical bias for traders. On Polymarket today, the contract for Sasnovich to advance sits at a current crowd-implied probability of 0% YES, a stark divergence from the live betting odds where Andreescu holds a slight edge at 1.8 versus Sasnovich’s 2.11[4]. This pricing reflects a market that has already priced in Andreescu’s dominance, particularly her recent record of winning the second set in four consecutive WTA Wimbledon matches[3].
Historically, qualification matches on grass often see lower-ranked players with strong serving games overcome higher-ranked opponents, yet Andreescu’s recent Grand Slam form—her last major title being the 2024 US Open—suggests a different narrative[6]. Traders should recall that in similar 2026 qualification scenarios, players with proven second-set resilience, like Andreescu, have frequently advanced even when initial odds were tight. The 0% probability here is not merely a statistical anomaly but a reflection of Andreescu’s consistent performance in the second set of grass-court matches, a pattern that has held across her last four WTA Wimbledon outings[3].
The primary catalysts for this market are the live match outcome and any potential cancellations or delays beyond the seven-day window, which would trigger a 50-50 resolution. Traders must monitor real-time updates on the match status, as Andreescu’s momentum in the second set is the key dependency for her advancement[3]. Recent coverage from Sportsnet confirms Andreescu is one win away from the main draw, making this match the definitive barrier[6]. With the settlement window ending on 2 July 2026, the on-chain mechanics using USDC on Polygon and conditional tokens will resolve based solely on whether Sasnovich or Andreescu advances, with no room for ambiguity in the event outcome.
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?
- Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Pronóstico: Wimbledon, Qualification WTA: Aliaksandr… on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Trade on PolyGram →